Ok, so now BigHeadDC is reporting the “documents.”
I’m no scientist, but those statements look a bit fishy.
Most statements I’ve seen try to find some kind of sorting method. Date, amount of miles, location…something.
Look at Sinclair’s:
Activity Dates are not synced with any sense of sorting; 11/1 is first, then 8/28, then 9/23, then out of the blue 11/3.
Location alphabetical listing; C0020, then TN068, then SC126, then IL142.
Points earned; First 390, then 590, then 3,500, then 2,220.
The only column that kind of makes sense is points earned. It’s the mostly sorted one of the three possible columns.
Except that the Illinois entry ruins it.
Not that I am a master of forgery, but given that the points earned seems to be properly sorted when excluding the last (easiest to forge) entry makes this document more than suspicious.
Not to mention that the last (possibly forged entry) was supposedly extended to November 8th (no departure proof provided).
Given that the statement date is 12/31/99 Sinclair is asking people to accept that 1) there was no sorting method used by the automated computerized statement process 2) The entries were randomly assigned 3) Despite the last entry being the easiest to forge 4) The otherwise correct statement doesn’t reflect the actual dates involved 5) The discrepancies in this mirror the discrepancies in every part of his record thus far… ergo he is correct.
BigHeadDC… get the goddamn boarding ticket stating Sinclair left Illinois on the 8th.
Recently:
- Place related post plugin php here...
- - Post 1
- - Post 2
- - Post 3
- - Post 4
- - Post 5
- - Post 6
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Category:

